Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
Diactoros140067dOkay let’s run those numbers and assume optimistically that 1 out of five hospitalizations from Covid19 are for breathing problems and require a reapirator (20%). I can’t find the source doing a quick google but I saw a CDC diagram showing that about 20% of all coronavirus cases required hospitalization(skewing older on age obviously but assume equal age distribution for simplicity). So let’s say conservatively 50% of the population is exposed and contracts coronavirus. That means 500 people with cases, 20% of those need a hospital(100), and 20% of THOSE need a ventilator (20). Now space them out over time with proper social distancing, and you may only see 5 cases simultaneously. So 5 per 1000 people, with relatively safe assumptions. That means we’re going to have doctors deciding who lives and who dies like Italy if we don’t all stay at home for a month.
> assume equal age distribution for simplicity
Here we have a much older population, so that would make the figures.. ?
> So let’s say conservatively 50% of the
> population is exposed and contracts
They reckon here, we are looking at 80% of the population exposed.
> So 5 per 1000 people, with relatively
> safe assumptions.
Assuming the updated figures ?
> if we don’t all stay at home for a month.
That will be difficult for the majority of the population here, since we have 0% unemployment and some folk even have more than one job ! (4 jobs isn't unusual..)
And most of those are in critical industries..
(Think industrial town.)
Already there are supply shortages, since there are not enough people to man the supply ships.
(25% reduction in workforce due to illness, and there was already an existing 5% of the workforce missing due to skilled labour shortages. )
Industry is on reduced working hours, thus reduced output..
There is quite a concern that the number of critical experts needed to maintain things is down to single figures, or in some cases, only one person on the entire island is available to fix the electricity network..
Planes / ships / trucks, buses, cars, are beginning to go out of services due to lack of spares and staff to fit them..
nibor304967dThis is the graph from the report.
The best case predicts the UK will need about 125 critical care beds per 100000 of population. The current capacity is 8 (I assume surge capacity is availability after taking off all the other existing requirements such as people who are critically ill for other reasons)
On the plus side, closing all the bars will probably free up a lot of resources from the accident and emergency departments in hospitals, especially on the weekend nights.
Yesterday's estimate figures by the WHO were :
Of infected :
95.5 % have mild to no symptoms over two weeks. This is the likeliest infection phase of their surroundings.
75.0 % are cured under quarantine without extreme medical care. About two weeks.
ALL are set under respiratory systems.
50.0 % of those intensive care patients die. Within roughly two weeks.
So you go for population by area and estimated infection rate per healing time.
That many respiratory systems your region will need.
Maybe I'll find that development description later and post it.
kleopi91667dsimply put: instead of doing maths, get more respirators...
Nanos941826d> So 5 per 1000 people
Where I am, we have had 1 death per 2,000 population, and 1 ventilator used per 12,000 population.
Anyone else got figures for their areas ?
Nanos941825dChecking a capital city location here of similar population size, the figures are:
1 death per 1,500 population, and 1 ventilator used per 500 population.