367
Comments
  • 0
    @jAsE For me it is not just Javascript. To he honest, I dislike nearly every dynamically typed language....
  • 2
    Not in haskell...

    @Phippsaurus I like you
  • 5
    @teganburns I made something like browser that loads xml-based .app pages that can run some c#.
  • 0
    @teganburns it's functionality of C# itself, called Reflection)

    @vigidis yes it's personal project for myself. It's shamefull to show to others, because you can just add windows and buttons in xml-layout, basic onClick event attribute to point to method in c# code connected via script tag.
  • 1
    .then((doSomething=>{arfffmaybe(doSomething)).catch(console.error("jesus chris"))
  • 0
    Say what you will but async code is soooo much easier to write and work with in JS, I very much like Promises since they're straightforward and do what you expect them to in a pretty immutable context.

    (although python's is probably even more straightforward, elegant and concise)
  • 1
    @woodworks I wouldn't say that python is simpler in this regards (disclaimer python isn't my strong language, so I could be wrong here). As I remember it, you'll have to start/stop threads on your own, while in JS it "just works" without thinking about threads.
  • 1
    @Wack true the async/await bit has some more overhead in python but I like that the control flow is simple enough that I can easily make threads and loops and run while waiting for a result, they managed to do async without the whole promise/maybe/optional jazz
Add Comment