Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@GayDicks420 This and the default software/firmware shipped with the devices have shit tons of security vulnerabilities.
-
TafT266yAnd some of the iffy companies can brick your device at a whim or simply by going under. Things should still work when the Internet connection goes down, not leave people without lights, ovens, washinmachines, kettles, toasters...
-
karelian3686yFor me it's mostly an issue of breaking the Unix philosophy: a tool should do one thing and do it right.
-
It is no way to live if you cannot make coffee without internet. I need coffee to solve the "no internet" problem...
-
devios157706yNot counting security, the biggest barrier to adoption I would say is standardization. Having everything under the sun on the internet *will* be revolutionary. The reason it’s not yet is we haven’t figured out how all these things should talk together. Supposing everything just implemented an HTTP server and had an IP address, now everything can talk to each other, the question is what do they say?
In full transparency I haven’t done a lot of research on this or anything but this is the impression I get: we just don’t know what “language” (in the protocol sense) these things should speak.
Related Rants
Why such hate on internet of things? Sure, it's not revolutionary, but I can see it being useful now and then
question
internet of shits
internet