Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
theuser3716107dYes, it is a word play, that's exactly what it is.
Elyz6375107dIt's a shitty joke in any form, people should stop making it. Usually it's socially awkward nerds who have no chance with ladies that spew shit like that.
ScriptCoded9778107dThought a very similar thought the moment I saw that image
EmberQuill1183107dI saw one that used object and struct, instead of object and class. I was slightly amused for a moment because the joke then actually made a tiny bit more sense.
But that wasn't enough to make the joke truly funny.
skqr78107dWhy so mad, bruh?
The joke is funny.
Word play is fun.
Was your cat just run over, or did you run out of your favourite cereal this morning?
Objects are indeed instances of classes - on some langs.
The joke suggests that rather than being seen as instances of the same class, reductive towards women, they are seen as individual classes, ironic due to being distinct but still reductive.
It's certainly not chauvinistic. It's a fucking harmless pun.
Minion492107dI think every women is a subclass of the women class
It feels god awful when a dev pun is technically incorrect.
By itself, it's like "hey guys, <programming joke> amirite?" expecting a "ha ha ha, i program too" response, it's just pandering.
and then an extra layer of not even being technically correct.
"its like pukin on a pile of shit"
Your Job Suck?
Take a quick quiz from Triplebyte to skip the job search hassles and jump to final interviews at hot tech firms
Get a Better Job