0

Low code from a developers perspective:

- it's like of someone cut off my legs from the knees down, because it's too complicated, and told me to pole vault. Crappy prosthetic sold separately, and it's charged per prosthetic.

-imagine using MS Word, but you had to, search for a word by typing it in, drag and drop each word, and you are not allowed to use bigger words or images without paying for a licence.

And to those who say this is the future, try using it for a month. Guarantee you will change your tune.

Comments
  • 1
    Low code can be very useful in a constrained scope where a user can stack actions together to create a macro like process.

    Or record activity for the same purpose.

    But once you try to replace more general programming you end up with much the same complexity since for any decently large solution its not the programming language that is hard but the actual state management and information flow.

    And without constraining the scope those issues will always be there.
  • 0
    @Voxera the way I see it is that if a language can barely go beyond "hello world" tutorial, why is this being hailed as a replacement for code?
  • 1
    @kingsukhoi because some hope that by saying it it will come true.

    Especially those paying for it ;)
Add Comment