Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
@saucyatom It's not that I lost it, it's that the state of the repo at that time makes no sense at all compared to anything else. I edited a bunch of code to break a cyclical dependency just so I can rename some symbols and then reconnect the cycle because the project demands it.
-
@saucyatom it's incredibly fucked, NuGet shouldn't allow cycles at all but somehow by mixing modern dependency declarations with obsolete formats from 7 years ago we managed to bend it into a pretzel so now if we need to update the types on the boundary we have to create a stub release that doesn't work (and thus doesn't call the cyclical codependency) but all the types and methods are in place.
-
@lorentz pretzel dependencies .. hmm ..
I played around with Git Rebase today to learn a bit about it, and it was fun, but in the process I completely obscured my process and erased a commit that has a published artifact associated with it. What remains is a few incremental preparation commits hoisted up from today's cleanup, then a pair of commits on two projects both of which only compile against the version of the other repo built from the other commit.
rant
git
history bending
rebase