3

Here's an idea: don't proclaim you've finished a feature (apparently in a silo) to leadership and then refuse to deliver it to the code repo.

Like, I totally get it, you used a fancy LLM and it spat out something that looks reasonable at a glance, but aren't sure because your environment wasn't actually set up for local testing (ie never actually run). But still, you could commit whatever garbage was spit out and have someone look at (or, more likely, completely re-write) it, but Nah, puffery is better than delivery I guess.

Comments
  • 3
    Are you my colleague?

    It amazes me how some people will just ask a third party to do their job and assume that it's done because the third party said so.
  • 2
    More than their own problems, LLMs reveal that a worrying proportion of people decide whether they should do something purely based on social pressure.
  • 1
    In this case, the job is not able to even be considered done, as there is no code given at this point. It might as well be ephemeral dream material for all I have.
Add Comment