Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
1. Not everyone wants to know or needs to know programming in depth. Programming has come a long way from just a few people working on mainframes and if you just want to build a quick visualiser or something in Processing for example you shouldn't need to know how to perform rotations in an AVL tree. That's a *good* thing.
2. For fields where things are more hardcore, young people are more hardcore. You've got people working their ass off on data structures, computer architecture, compiler technology, systems programming etc and boy are they good. People of my age (22) contribute to very hardcore projects like the Haskell compiler or Blender. I know people who make interpreters and functional languages and optimizing compilers and persistent data structures for fun. These folks can program circles around most people.
Programming has become mainstream but the core of good specialized programmers will always be there.
asgs434480dUse a library only when you can't be bothered to write what it offers
electrineer924780dNot everyone needs to reinvent the wheel. They can invent better cars instead.
Fjord11680dDon't know what library you're on about. I use Intel math kernel library all the time, I just want my code to run fast, should I be bothered knowing how the optimisations being handled by compilers?
musician110652dProgramming will get easier and thats a good thing. Focus on the product instead of the build process. Thats what happens to pretty much any industry out there.
For example in my main field, audio engineering, there are a lot of tools these days doing the mundane, repetitive things. That doesnt mean I'm out of jobs but that I can focus more on the creative part of the process.
Your Job Suck?
Take a quick quiz from Triplebyte to skip the job search hassles and jump to final interviews at hot tech firms
Get a Better Job