39
frogstair
30d

uTorrent wtf is this explain

Comments
  • 28
    should move off to qbit or similar
  • 23
    uTorrent is shit, use qBitTorrent instead.
  • 4
  • 8
    So its essentially "pay for seeders" then. qBitTorrent is the way to go, but Deluge has also gotten a facelift on linux.
  • 10
    Commeeeeercializaaaaation
  • 0
    Utorrent is shit, I used cracked folx and it’s amazing
  • 1
    Tixati
    Transmission
    Qbit
    Pick your flavour, BitTorrent / Utorrent are commercialised and the same product, what could you possible expect?
  • 9
    uTorrent is an ad infested garbage since a lot of time ago.
  • 2
    Why the actual fuck are you using that piece of shit
    Use an actual torrent client
  • 1
    isn't torrent supposed to be the same on any client?
  • 7
    Qbitorrent is gold. I ditched out uTorrent and BitTorrent when they started putting ads many years ago
  • 2
    Deluge or go home
  • 0
    I use seedr.cc to download stuff, first download it on cloud within seconds and then download it at normal internet speed.
  • 4
    Transmission ftw, especially for seedboxes :)
  • 5
    What the others said. Personally using qBittorrent, it works well and you can theme the GUI

    PS: You might want to scan your PC for leftover shit
  • 0
    I lived under a stone. Bittorrent (BTT) is a currency? Holy medaroli
  • 0
    Go for Transmission
  • 2
    @dmonkey That depends on how the torrenting software is written!
  • 0
    Transmission, it has a docker container with integrated openVPN
  • 1
    I remember using uTorrent long time ago when it didn't have any ads.
  • 0
    transmission is light, works well and has remote-management and docker versions.
  • 0
    @kiki does folx support torrents? I thought it was just a file downloader.
  • 0
    @uziiuzair I use folx for torrents exclusively
  • 1
    Transmission for sure
Add Comment