9

I really think 1 hr+ meetings are a fucking waste of time. By minute 40, people's attentions waver.

If I ever run my own shop I will fucking ban meetings that last more than 30 minutes, and have a hard cap of 7 people per meeting and require a fucking agenda. God damn it. Being stuck in meetings where 90% of crap not relevant to me is bs.

#TiltedMonday

Comments
  • 1
    30 min is the optimal meeting time. Anything longer, and people quickly stop paying attention. Shorter, and there isn't enough time to get through the agenda
  • 3
    Those 2 hour sprint planning meetings 🙄😴
  • 1
    30 mins are ideal. Any longer and my nap risks turning into a full snooze. Any shorter and I don’t feel rested.
  • 4
    I had an all-day meeting last week. Seven hours, with an hour break for lunch. My brain basically turned off around the two-hour mark and my entire afternoon is just a blank spot in my memory. They could have fired me in the meeting and I wouldn't have noticed.
  • 0
    @rutee07 I envy your stand ups
  • 0
    2 hour long meetings rarely if ever require my constant attention, so I just listen in the background as if it was an audiobook or something.
  • 0
    @EmberQuill I'm dying 😂😂😂
  • 0
    It's been said that no matter how long a meeting is - people will find a way to fill up the time.

    If a meeting is an hour it doesn't seem that bad to spend 5 minutes on introductions and 5 minutes on a recap.

    If you just have 15 minutes people will get to the meat of the task right away and there's no need for a recap.
Add Comment