wake up

I already wrote a long complaint about CSS selectors, but let me just reiterate that

1. Because you have to retype them every time, you're motivated to keep class names short
2. Because you can't alias a subselector, you're motivated to introduce redundant classes for elements that could be derived from an existing class
3. Short class names and a greater than necessary number of classes mean that conflicts are likely
4. Because the default combinator is arbitrary depth, collisions along with spontaneous matches from nested components introduce unexpected matches

This is why I use gimp and upload jpegs of buttons to my website

Really depends on which parts of CSS you hate.

I use sass in every project but don't use any features from it... :P
But damn I'M USING SASS

@ostream great...

I am a simple man, I see kiki saying something about CSS, even if a meme, and I read, I listen and I learn.

Remember lads, no one knows CSS, except for Kiki, only Kiki knows CSS.

You (person reading this that is not kiki)might think you know CSS, but you do not.

Hail kiki!

Lol, I'll never touch CSS without SASS..

At least there is strcture with SASS. I would just love compilation to be faster. Right now it takes around a minute to recompile around 250 SASS fioles in application and bundle them

@gogokun it's not vanila JS if you are using react