See the 3 glyph word. It is not na'arah. It is na'ar. It means child. Also do not ignore the greek which says padia (from which you get paedophile (padia+philos), and the latin says puella: young girl.

Now: white people will lie to you: white people do NOT want men marrying little girls. White people see the old testament through the lens of the new: which doesn't want men to exist at all (read the greek).

So no: your "revelation" is not new: you are simply reading the english "interlinear" instead of the hebrew glyphs themselves: which says na'ar.

See the 3 glyph word. It is not na'arah. It is na'ar. It means child. Also do not ignore the greek which says padia (from which you get paedophile (padia+philos), and the latin says puella: young girl.

Now: white people will lie to you: white people do NOT want men marrying little girls. White people see the old testament through the lens of the new: which doesn't want men to exist at all (read the greek).

So no: your "revelation" is not new: you are simply reading the english "interlinear" instead of the hebrew glyphs themselves: which says na'ar.

@SoldierOfCode You're wrong. Read the hebrew glyphs themselves: it says na'ar. (נַעַר) Not na'arah (נַעֲרָה)

(Remember: the dots etc were added around 1000ad.)

And in ancient hebrew na'ar is a child.

Read below (image).

Additionally you can read here: ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/179/Q3/

>Nachmanides points out that a child may be called na'ar from the moment he is born.

The greek translated it correctly as padia (child); as did the roman puella (young girl).

Your modern re-interpretation is wrong; just as the reinterpetation of the psalms is wrong (where “sons are a blessing from YHWH: for they are like a quiver full of arrows: and will destroy your enemies at the gate” becomes to the white “Children are a blessing from the Lord: for they are like a quiver full of arrows: and will testify on your behalf at the court”_

@SoldierOfCode

@SoldierOfCode You're wrong. Read the hebrew glyphs themselves: it says na'ar. (נַעַר) Not na'arah (נַעֲרָה)

(Remember: the dots etc were added around 1000ad.)

And in ancient hebrew na'ar is a child.

Read below (image).

Additionally you can read here: ohr.edu/ask_db/ask_main.php/179/Q3/

>Nachmanides points out that a child may be called na'ar from the moment he is born.

The greek translated it correctly as padia (child); as did the roman puella (young girl).

Your modern re-interpretation is wrong; just as the reinterpetation of the psalms is wrong (where “sons are a blessing from YHWH: for they are like a quiver full of arrows: and will destroy your enemies at the gate” becomes to the white “Children are a blessing from the Lord: for they are like a quiver full of arrows: and will testify on your behalf at the court”

@SoldierOfCode test

@Demolishun

<---Read

@Demolishun You kill men and countries who want to marry their own cute young girl virgins.

So yea: the only reasoning with you is to slice your limbs apart and ask you then if you still support the New Testament tranny dick sawing faggotry and woman worship: if you still hate the old testament God and say citing his Law in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin is perversion.

@Demolishun >embroiled in their own perversion and using scripture to justify this end.

There is nothing perverted about marrying cute young virgin girls.

You say citing Old Testament Law that allows it is "perversion": just as your demi-god: Jesus: said the old testament God is "the father of the adversary, and a liar and a murderer from the begining".

We are at war. That's the only way to settle this: to kill you dead and gone : just as you have killed afghans for marrying cute young girls.

FUCK you.