Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
On the live server issue:
Not without testing and it'd normally do selected upgrades when needed because new dependency or some security patch or the likes.
It's always a balanced decision between having new things, bug fixes, it working correctly, having the update being tested first. -
Linux438107yapt-get upgrade is fine to run in prod.
apt-get dist-upgrade is not fine to run in prod. -
I've never gotten burned running upgrade on an LTS version of Ubuntu. (except with Nvidia drivers-- totally different rant)
It's good to snapshot production servers before running upgrades. Shit happens.
So our webserver teacher have been throwing around the idea that before installing anything on a Ubuntu Sever, you should run apt-get update (yes you should)
But, he also instructed everyone to run apt-get upgrade as well (in case some dependencies need to be updated)
Now for fucks sake:::::
1) apt will automatically sort out dependencies when you install a new program
2) you never ever efffing fucking wanna run apt-get upgrade on a live server. I'm not a sysadmin, but this seems like a really fucking bad idea, right?
rant
apt-get upgrade ubuntu-server