60
xsfjx
124d

I don't see women as objects.
I consider each to be in a class of her own

Comments
  • 5
    Nice. πŸ‘Š
  • 8
    As long as you don't view us as Properties.
  • 1
    @xsfjx smooth dude
  • 1
    @platypus a woman can't be just properties. Because each of them has her own methods to do things
  • 4
    So women are singletons?
  • 0
    @platypus Class is betterπŸ˜‰πŸ˜
  • 7
    I see us more as legacy code. Works great, but no one knows how. And, if you touch it, you know you're in for a world of trouble.
  • 0
    @platypus yeah , you are rightπŸ˜‚
    One of the non endless warsπŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
  • 4
    I was looking for something concrete, and was ready to instantiate a child, but she was all abstract and didn't like my methods. When I tried to talk to her about polymorphism, she got offended. Later I found out she was philosophically opposed to multiple inheritance.
Your Job Suck?
Get a Better Job
Add Comment