Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
bahua128016yIf they're prod, they should definitely be patched about once a quarter. Every 90 days or so.
-
Condor323326yHere I reboot my servers once a month. Once a week is a bit much IMO, but it allows kernel patches to be applied quickly. Provided that there's a second redundant server for each, this is good practice. Having a server running for a year without security patches on the other hand... My "security teacher" used to be like that too. She was an idiot for managing her servers like that. And they wondered why they were getting cyber attacks all the time... Makes me wonder if she'd maintain her p*ssy like that too 🙄
UPDATE AND REBOOT THE FUCKING SERVER ALREADY!!! 😠-
Condor323326y@-ANGRY-CLIENT- the sakurity teacher there? Nah you wouldn't want that, way too old 😛 she was already in her late 40's I think. She looked kinda hot when she once came to class in a sailor outfit though.. but that's about it. Flat as a washboard, kinda old, personality was a bit of a meh, etc etc.
All the Linux servers I manage:
Uptime 300+ days
All the Linux server I manage inside hyper-v managed by our it:
Uptime max 7 days...
Wtf? Do you really have to restart the host machine once a week?
rant