Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
@sergiolarosa89 Like 1337 h4x0r script kiddies, but for python users who can't code but use the language for ML
devTea261272yBlame the retards ml wannabe, not us
But... b... but I love python and neural networks👨🎤
@-ANGRY-CLIENT- I have no problem with people who use python. I dislike people who only "learn" python because of NN libraries. Python is not the fastest language. But if you're a CPP programmer you are hardcore enough to write your own NN.
There are plenty of JS and Java libraries. That's why I'm building my customizable nn in C# (ML.NET is not cool for neural networks)
Like fann? (http://leenissen.dk/fann/wp/)
Or OpneNN? (http://www.opennn.net/)
What actually *new* do you think you can invent?
Writing it in C# will only accomplish one thing: Making it extraordinarily slow.
Sorry if I sound harsh. I just fear that you will spend many hours for a result that will be nowhere near where you dream it to be...
@Yamakuzure You're not too harsh, I've also considered it can be a bit slow.
My idea is to allow people develop new algorithms, while still using the neurons and layers idea of the neural network. For example instead of doing ax+b (a is a weight and b is a bias) we can do mx^2 + nx + b (m and n are weights and b is a bias)
I had that idea (x^2) half an year ago, so I had decided to built a generic NN library. My goal for 2019 is to do it the right way (I tried once but my tests, the code and everything was terrible)
I don't need it to be extremely fast because people would be writing proofs of concept and then maybe write their own faster implementation.