Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
Abstract methods can be anything (visibility wise) other than private. Nothing stopping you specifying a protected abstract method for example.
Method definitions in interfaces though are always public (ignoring Java 8+ with static / default methods), so the public visibility modifier is always redundant.
Related Rants
Coworker's whiteboard today
Hi, so currently in my Java course, I'm learning about abstract classes. I noticed how a method in an abstract class can use an access modifier, however, interfaces don't use them.
In addition to this, I noticed that IntelliJ didn't give me an error stating that adding an access modifier was redundant or useless. So I wanted to know if there is a point in adding access modifiers to abstract methods.
Thanks so much for anyone who can help me out with this!
question
abstract classes
java