Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
xalys16075yYes. I use LiteSpeed WS and LiteSpeed Web ADC in production. mod_lsapi is nice combined with alt-php or passenger (when using php or python - haven’t used it with ruby), but if you’re on a non-CP box without cgroups, just use apache + event MPM or nginx and PHP-FPM and performance will be more or less the same. You’ll just miss a nice interface but if you have snmp or something you won’t miss too much.
-
Linux434835y@xalys
Is the performance really the same?
I have always used apache event and PHP-FPM, but according to this site: https://http2benchmark.org/
LiteSpeed is waaay faster than everyone.
I am wondering if it is worth the switch from Apache Event with PHP-FPM to OpenLiteSpeed with lsphp? -
xalys16075y@Linux not in my experience. It really depends on the hardware. You can squeeze much more out of older hardware with LSWS, but I keep my hardware up to date and have not seen significant lower resource usage or performance improvements. I also use apache event mpm + mod_lsapi (only possible with cloudlinux) at scale in production. It does not perform better than PHP-FPM (I do give each user their own FPM master process).
-
Linux434835y@xalys
Ah you do apache + php the same as me then.
I was thinking about moving Nextcloud to OpenLiteSpeed, and gain some performance
Have anyone here used OpenLiteSpeed?
If so, what do you think about it?
question