So it's been almost a whole day and I've still not managed to Install Arch with LUKS/LVM and grub2. Time to give up? Yes.

  • 0
    Noooo. Don't give up.
    Arch has bootctl. Maybe you can use that instead of GRUB.
  • 1
    @orhun ended up just installing Arch without LUKS/LVM. Just like I had it before. 🤷‍♂️
  • 1
    when you have to put in 100 manhours of work just for Arch to install successfully, maybe it's not user error... maybe the OS is just shit.
  • 0
    Have a look at Manjaro, it's arch based and a damn sight easier to install than pure arch. (disclaimer, I can't remember if it had an option for LUKS/LVM on install though, it must be there somewhere though).
Add Comment