Tonight I rest well...

May I ask what this is?

@Mitch377 very true.

@tisaconundrum It's a code coverage report, it shows which parts of the code are tested with automated tests and which are not.

@kvsm you should try coding in type safe languages (read Haskell 😎) and see for yourself that you will be able to write such correct programs you won't need 100% test coverage

@addvilz hope you're enjoying working on your crusty old monolith I guess

@rayanon I've been doing a bit of PureScript recently, loving it. ☺👍

Still needs tests to ensure that your logic is right though 😉

@kvsm Cool! Re: tests for logic - very true.

I'm not going to debate your views, you are entitled to them, but you're out of order to dismiss the author of that talk so quickly. Greg Young definitely knows enough about composing maintainable systems for his thoughts on the matter to be worth listening to, by anyone.

@DLMousey Nah, no flame wars, arguing over opinions on the Internet is never a fruitful endeavour. ☺

Well this hostility was uncalled for, honestly. Let the lad enjoy his good work, obviously at some point he will write codes in thousands of lines, but everyone starts somewhere!
#KeepDevrantPositive
#RantAboutMoronsNotEachOther

@Justananon Well said! I have worked on larger projects professionally, this is just a side project I started the other day. ☺ I wanted to investigate the performance differences between brute forcing a solution to a sudoku puzzle, and solving it by logic (there are brute force solvers on npm, but I wanted one that could also step through a solution as a human would solve it). Anyway, it'll be on npm when it's done. 👍

Don't feed the troll.

@kvsm thank you for this. I'm glad code rewrites are not a bad thing.

@addvilz Yaaawwwn.