Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
New York Times does a good job with covering this sort of thing with graphs and etc:
https://www.nytimes.com/
The thing to keep in mind is that you can 'lead' a state because the districts in that state that generally support you are the only ones reporting ... and you can still be predicted to lose because you don't have a big enough lead to overcome the districts yet to report, that they know you won't get many votes.
Leads only mean something, in a given context.
This isn't a case where everything is reported evenly. -
I trust AP for this sort of thing.
But I'm not even going to bother checking on this shit for like three days.
No spoilers, kay guys? -
lopu8915y@N00bPancakes they still don't have a simple won votes vs leading votes count though... would be so simple just to show an electoral votes based on leading states not just won states
Related Rants

This is where US's bandwith is going
An ancient scripture describing our impending doom found on Stack Overflow
https://stackoverflow.com/questio...
Is there a website which includes leading states in the total electoral vote count? Not just won states?
rant
election
us