Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple APILearn More
Oktokolo702919dYou apply to the wrong jobs - they are obviously filtering for code monkeys.
Oktokolo702919d@TeachMeCode I am a bit slower too. But being slower in general isn't what makes me a bad match for such jobs. I like to iterate over my code, refactor and polish it before i call it done for now. Even if i would be as fast as everyone else, i would be too slow, because my process is inherently slower iteratively writing original code which is reusable and easy to maintain. If i see a design flaw later in the process, i will likely fix it regardless of deadlines.
Maybe you have the same "problem" and need to find a job which requires research and writing of original code instead of just glueing together slightly modified snippets from StackOverflow...
max199316219dIt would be funny if those tasks are actual bug reports that no one wanted to code down. Using the interviewee as cheap workforce to save cost.
Don't worry, I won't do these tasks at all.
After all, if my job is to work 8 hour shifts solving 40 min problems... I'd rather flip burgers, seems a more rewarding choice.
TeachMeCode333618d@IntrusionCM Im glad you brought up fast food bc these exams are all about doing simple tasks as quickly as possible, as if you’re working at Burger King. You have a customer giving you a huge order “TWO KING SIZED WHOPPER SUPREMES TRIPLE PADDIES FOUR KING SIZED FRIES APPLE PIE SUPREME ADD A PINCH OF MAYO AND MAKE THE PEPSI DIET”. Im pretty sure there are culinary trained chefs who would fail at this, bc they’re not used to fast haphazard monkey work
I don't like these tasks.... Or rather: I'm entirely against it.
For the reason you mentioned - you cannot verify knowledge by this nor the abilities of the person.
At worst people learned the stuff from the thousands of leetcode bootcamps, have zero experience and repeat what they learned by heart.
Recruiting should focus on the personality - after all, you can teach someone who want to be taught a lot. Expecting someone to be "ready to use" at recruiting is already the wrong assumption...