Why in the fucking world did I decide to manually use @media screen in CSS instead of Bootstrap, I'm down to 212px wide screen now just because I can't stand that SOMEBODY might have a bloody screen that size.

I think the same, but changing "@media" with "bootstrap" and "bootstrap" with "@media".
Man, I can't use that thing!

If the screens that small they don't deserve to see it.

no one will have a screen below 320. go to 300 and leave it, 320 if its a pain.

At work we limit to 320.

@hax0r so we have a small scale... what would be the largest scale possible?

My 2c.

Tip. Never relate breakpoints to screen size. its non scalable.

Instead relate it to content. i.e. start small and as room becomes available add a breakpoint and rejig the page... as you increase res... add another etc etc. that way it will work on anything from low res mobiles to outdoor screens.

@tisaconundrum max 740 for us but I know others go up to 900.

@hax0r surely it depends on the site? the average screen size is supposedly 1024px in width therefore I usually make sites with a main container that starts at 1020px in width. 900px on a 1920px screen, which is also very common would just look odd imo.

@craig939393 Yeah I'm not sure why this is the current standard in our group. I'll ask my fed next time. Decisions were made b4 I started but I'm thinking we should change the rule.