Yoda, is that you?

@deusprogrammer except that you still get a perpetual fallback license every year

Yea, windows has had powershell remoting for a while too, but that doesn't mean it's not cool that I can use ssh now

In fact, java will usually beat C in allocation heavy workloads, because allocation can be INCREDIBLY cheap in java.

But is it "see-qual" Claus, or "es-que-el" Claus?

For context, https://xkcd.com/936/

'Correct horse battery staple' is 28 characters

Try this:

char arr[100];
sizeof(arr); // 100
sizeof(&arr[0]); // 8 on 64 bit

Arrays are not pointers, but they are implicitly coerced to pointers in a lot of places (e.g. Function calls)

@Torbuntu if you buy it yourself, you're explicitly allowed to use it at work.

@bioDan I'm going to pretend that was part of the badness of the code, and not just a mistake I made here.. 😅

Surprised you didn't link to this stackoverflow answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/1732454

@bittersweet oh! I thought they were average commit stats... That makes a lot more sense..

Interesting. I had done something similar with a camera flash.

Long exposure in the dark, with two flashes. One with nobody there, one with people there.

I use Intellij products, with the vim plugin. Best if both worlds

@linuxxx yep, everyone has their preferences. But some people's preferences are wrong. 😃

That's the problem with ++.. It doesn't just increment. It also returns the previous or new value.

Not even in the top 10 worst for me

Git as a concept is amazing, and the cheap branching enabled by the way it works is a game changer. (not that it does anything unique, or even really new, but it made it mainstream)

Git itself, though, is a mess. Wildly inconsistent, dangerous, and easy to screw up.

Eat Arby's.

Aww, well at least you can be wrong together.

Ever looked at clojure? It also compiles to the jvm, but surely you wouldn't call it a framework. The syntax is wildly different.

Or does this mean all languages that have a llvm backend are frameworks for each other? C, and D, (and kotlin, now), and Rust can all compile to something common: LLVM bytecode.

I completely disagree, and have serious issues understanding anyone who doesn't see kotlin as an improvement on java

Yes, from a typesystem point of view, NaN is a number. It's a special numeric value to show that the value can't be represented. For the same reason, null's type is object, even though it represents that there is no object.

Refactor into more functions

Better hope your language supports tail call elimination, or that's just a stack overflow waiting to happen

For constant layout, I use the editor. For everything else, XML.

Like parsing an integer. C# gets it right there, at least, thanks to out parameter support.

I believe so that they can return an EOF value

Also of note: Log.wtf short for "what [a] terrible failure"