@whimsical I won’t create more bots just for this nut job

Btw who is stupid enough to believe that someone posts a hacker recommendation and then instantly another devrant user sees it on devrant and also had experience with exactly this hacker and is confirming the recommendation?

Only ad spammers like you fucking retard are stupid enough to think that users on devrant are that stupid.

@whimsical yes I know. I‘m just too lazy to create more bots.

Please downvote this asshat.
I only have 4 downvote bots and they have used up their votes.

@jestdotty what do you mean, what?

You call every behavior that you don’t like "narcissistic" and everyone who you don’t like or disagree with a "narcissist".

That means when we hear it from you, it doesn’t mean what it actually means. You inflated it and robbed it of its meaning.

That might fit well into your world where every definition of words is personal opinion, but in the real world we like to rely on the actual definitions to be able to communicate effectively.

@jestdotty you use the word "narcissistic" way too inflationary but I mostly agree.

Thinking about it, if the review AI analyzer is for the app owners, then why should they care? They are probably the ones who will illegally produce those fake reviews in the first place.

It seems to me that the only thing that would make sense is for the potential users of an app to be able to check for fake reviews.

Website looks quite nice and professional.
However the main purpose seems to be a central distribution and testing platform, no mentions about the AI reviews analyzer.
But it sounds like it doesn’t belong into such a platform anyway. Unless the target users are the owners of the app that they want to analyze the reviews for.
From your comment I had the impression that it was for the potential users of the apps, like I see an app in the store and want to check if one of their reviews is AI.

Also, since there are already some competitors in the market, I‘d like to see why I should use your service rather than the others which have the advantage of already being established.

@whimsical sloppily?

@Nmeri17 come on, don’t take it personally but why should we want to read some rant written like a freaking novel with unnecessary horse shit padding?
It’s not a platform for sharing poetry.
Get to the point with the minimum amount of text and I‘ll gladly read and ++ it.

@whimsical

> sure, everything comming from you is considered a compliment.

It’s most certainly not! 😅

> I've noticed that you didn't upvote my nice comment to doggii man. Is that personal? Asking for a friend.

Doggii man? Do you mean kiki with the hotdog comment? I think I did ++ that.
Not that I need to explain myself when I don’t ++ ^^

@whimsical I don’t have anything bad to say about Mono. Which is a compliment already.
Xamarin however, what a shit fest!

Yup, totally looks like written by AI.
Reading it is painful.

@jestdotty This is how I feel about many of your rants and comments tbh. I‘m not trying to be mean.

@12bitfloat yes you just derive the struct from Codable and the compiler synthesizes everything for you.
Customization can be done either via annotations on particular properties or via the serializer for overall rules like casing.

@whimsical

> Seriously, did someone ever used Mono professionally?

Yup, when I was using Xamarin.

@whimsical that‘s far from the biggest question.

Swift is Turing complete, so of course you can do it with Swift.

If your question is if I specifically could do it, then no.
I‘d need to learn a couple of things first.
But after that, obviously yes, I could do it.

@afaIk it‘s not even relevant if it‘s true because it‘s about a different topic.

Not only did it compare the wrong languages but it also talked about abstractions and safety, which is not directly related to the topic of serialization.

Useless pseudo intellectual crap.

@12bitfloat I‘m curious if the 3rd party lib from Newtonsoft is still the de facto standard for json serialization in C# 😅

But I can relate:
In Swift you just conform to Encodable/Decodable and the struct is ready to go for whatever serialization format that you like.

@afaIk he is talking about C#, not C++.
Your comment sounds like AI btw.

@whimsical it’s also totally ok to ignore Docker in 2026 🤗

It doesn’t look bad to me but imho not every game needs to aim at photorealism.
I‘m worried that this will lead to more games looking exactly the same, which is bad.

@whimsical lol

AI slop enshitification

@whimsical not a fan of bratwurst. I‘d rather have a Wiener or a 🌭

> putting an image in 2 PDFs

I think I just threw up a little.

@retoor Define what it means to be the last user on devrant ^^

@whimsical

> And yes, diagnosing you as autistic is an attack for sure.

Eggscuse me?!

I‘m too lazy to try to figure it out.
What‘s the trick? ^^

Shit, we might be at the actual death of devrant. Creating rants still not possible.