@Wozza365 that's just it, we don't use html or css or JavaScript to create the user interface except for when we load the webassembly module. All buttons, text fields, and other UI elements are created using a framework for the C or C++ language. This way we can bypass JS entirely and go to compiled languages.

This use case won't be very common for a while, but my hope is that webassembly will be improved to the point where we can have user interface and do computations on the web at native speeds.

Many people may not like this idea, but it's one I'm willing to explore.

@Wozza365 they don't specify that it's meant to replace JavaScript, but I'm thinking more of developing web apps without using the DOM at all bypassing the whole DOM architecture. I'm thinking more of a complete change of how web development is done using the traditional methods of html/css/js.

@iSwimInTheC sarcasm I'm assuming?

That sounds rather distracting. And if you are not working for a job at 3 a.m. in the morning and you're bored it sounds like you'd better go to bed.

@R1100 Sounds good. When do I start?

But what about refactoring for better readability and efficiency?

No no. I mean look on the internet for research on computer science concepts regarding chess. Also, if you want to ask experts, how do you find out what they've written? In most cases today, the internet, since many experts may live in a different city or country than you do. When I say the internet, I also mean posting or published papers written by experts. Unless of course you want to spend a lot of money on plane tickets to visit all of those experts in person.

Also, you're asking your peers at this moment by posting here. Ensuring that you keep the context of your question in mind, the internet is the best tool you can use.

@YouAreAPIRate If we gave javascript a major overhaul, I think a lot of people would argue against things like promises and 'async' execution. Otherwise it might just be the same thing for many people. The reason many people are wanting to go to WebAssembly (myself included), is because they want to get away from those types of operations and prefer static typing.

Check the internet

Check the internet. Not for these books, but for the subjects in these books. Heck, you could create a checklist of things to research on the internet based off of the books table of contents, which you could preview on Amazon.

@towmeykaw I am in the same boat as you

And to all devs in general, for that matter.

Where do you see Chinese?

Some languages don't need to follow the object-oriented paradigm. Some languages are created for a specific purpose​ that would be best done in a different paradigm.

I do enjoy OOP, but we cannot call ourselves developers and limit ourselves to just one language or paradigm.

Oh hoho. A "small" shell script. That just adds oil to the burn.

You have quite a long way to go...

@heyheni yes, although that does not guarantee that people will reply promptly or even within an hour even when they're at their desk.

@uziiuzair dear God no.

@uziiuzair no you wouldn't

Use templateUrl instead. Keep your html and JavaScript in separate files as recommended.

Same. I still have problems with that in my project.

@rtannerf the remedy?

I'd hate that. Kinda need a number pad.

On the contrary, that might have been intentional.

Are you using it for Twitter?

Sucks

One reason why I switched to Ubuntu

@Samrodev I feel your pain. The problem I'm facing is a memory leak in an Angular2 app. This will be the first memory leak I've encountered in my <2 years of experience where something in my code, not a third party library, is causing the leak. Good luck to us both.

Edit: not necessarily because of lack of experience, but because you couldn't​ solve a problem you came up against.

That's why I switched over to Linux as my main OS. So much better than the windows I had running on my laptop before.