2

So I’m very biased against JavaScript. However, beliefs need to be challenged. If you feel like it, convince me that this language is worth using as part of the tech stack.

Comments
  • 3
    Many years ago I also thought like that. Then I needed to learn web development with javascript. I thought that I need to give js a chance. Maybe it was good. After a couple of months with js I learned how god awful this clown language is. It’s the equivalent of eating shit after many years of normal food. I started to hate js with every part of my soul.
  • 1
    @jestdotty agree. The problem is: in practice it's not used to write prototypes.
  • 0
    Maybe, you know any wasm languages? If no, you've no choice. Learn and forget, someday it might be useful.
  • 3
    what do you mean "as part of the tech stack"? if you mean web, yes, you need a derivative of JavaScript. just know if you use TypeScript (yes i am a fan) it ultimately compiles to JavaScript

    i'm always boggled by people who are anti Javascript then start squirming when their platform / company / whatever needs a website

    c# / rust / go is great... FOR BACKEND WORK

    UNTIL YOU NEED A FUCKING WEBSITE

    backend only devs get fucking wrecked in the face

    why don't you just use the technology, i dunno. that was designed for the fucking platform you are using

    god, rubes making life hard for themselves, you deserve your pain
  • 1
    @fullstackcircus oh and fuck the fuck of with wasm. sure, it'll work great, but show me an example when it works great for a whole website and then i'll be fully with you

    until then, as i said, use the tools web was built with, is it really that hard?
  • 0
    For interactive or animated elements in a web page, and a minimalistic use case, then it's generally the more straight-forward approach.

    People grow to hate the damn thing because they use it for complex tasks instead, which is just asking for trouble. If they were forced to then I get it, but if not, they're fucking stupid.

    Outside of the browser it serves no purpose and better alternatives abound.

    So, should you use javascript? If you have a dead simple frontend tasks, it's just fine. And if you prefer replacing it with an over-complicated source of mediocrity and embarrassment to the human intellect that transpiles to javascript, just to avoid writing it by hand, then that's also fine.

    Just pick your fucking poison already.
  • 0
    UsE wAsM
    *proceeds to generate a 3MB wasm file for a hello world page that took a week to develop* 🤡
  • 0
    y'all keep winning and mi mi mi, size, mi mi mi, buah buah, me me me me me me

    so narrow minded, see "web" and can't think straight

    wasm's not a replacement for anything. the whole fucking purpose of the thing is running shit across platforms.

    For fuck sakes, it doesn't even need a fucking browser to run.
    Stop embarrassing yourselves
  • 0
    So far I've only seen backend retards cry about a few kb js being bloated while anything they make is at least 100x that size 🤡🤡
  • 2
    @jestdotty brainfuck is also a mega simple language 🤷
Add Comment