If robots are "Artificial Intelligence" for us.
Then are we "Artificial Robots" for them ???

Artificial is meant as an adjective that runs in dichotomy to natural. I.E man-made. We are a natural intelligence though, so we aren't artificial robots.

We would be natural robots.

Then they should be Artificial Humans, and I think not everybody should be called «intelligence» 😂

Humans are a specific family in a specific species that have specific traits that robots don't have.

Intelligence on the other hand is something that is shared among many different natural organisms, and the term "artificial intelligence" is supposed to expose that intelligence can exist artificially. I.E there's no evidence that intelligence is innately natural.

We are fundamentally built from quarks that have spin, so are computers. At a higher layer, we have neurons, that in a group form what we consider intelligence, with other parts of our brain.

Neurons can be represented in code, even at a very low level, using something like assembly.

If we build upon neurons and form the same structure as a human brain, it would function identically to us, and have the same intelligence and emotional awareness etc. (Unless you're religious then you wouldn't believe this)

And short after, because of Moore's law, they would greatly surpass us in intelligence, once they're at our level.

Maybe more like Evolutional Machinery?

str = artificial
a, b = robots, intelligence
c = a
a = b
b = c

def hum()
for i in [a, b]
while i == True
print(str + i)

def num()
if i = i - 1
return i
num()
hum()

We are just pieces of shit for them