Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
Hazarth9521103dEven that would cause this. They would also have to so busy waiting instead of using blocking calls.
You have to do a lot of wrong stuff to make Java peg all your cores, just like any other language -
Chewbanacas732102dI wanted to make a stupid joke about how verbose Java code is, but then stumbled upon some -verbose option which shows when and possibly how often classes are loading during runtime. Maybe that might help?
Alternatively, running a profiler? -
Demolishun35044102d@Chewbanacas the code is to simulate a real device. We will be talking to the real device soon. I don't really want to troubleshoot their shit code anyway.
-
Chewbanacas732102d@Demolishun understandable
Fixing other peoples code and getting blamed for making it worse because of obfuscated caveats is the absolute fucking worst
Related Rants
Question for all you Java devs out there (and a story). We have a customer that we interfacing with their machine. They sent us a simulator that runs in Windows written in Java. I did try running it in Linux, but the JVMs I have installed did not like it at all. Complained about missing deprecated stuff. I start up their sim in Windows and find it is opening between 50 and 100 network ports. Then I tell the simulator to run inside the gui for their program. It pegs all of my processor cores at 100%. I have pegged cores in software before, then corrected my errors in my code. However, I have never pegged all the cores at once. I am kind of in shock.
So, how hard is it to peg all the cores in a Java program? I assume they have a thread on every port or some nonsense?
question
100%
java
cpu