Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
@Tounai Kinda? rustdoc/docs.rs is just objectively so awesome I can't really complain
It literally compiles documentation for *all* crates on crates.io for all versions, with types fully interlinked between dependencies, etc etc
It's just the best thing ever -
Java did the same years before
Fuck auto-generated function references, they're not a replacement for proper hand-written documentation
It achieves the exact opposite: looks like shit and is unusable (no logical grouping, introduction or examples), less devs are willing to spend time because "the magic tool generates everything" -
@devRancid If you think Java or C++ (doxygen) even comes CLOSE to the Rust experience then you have never used Rust, it's so beautiful
And yeah, obviously good hand written documentation is even better. But most non rust libraries don't even have auto generated documentation, or at least one that doesn't suck ass (doxygen)! -
Like this shit is what I have to deal with in JS world (and this is even above average!): https://glmatrix.net/docs/
Meanwhile in Rust: https://docs.rs/cgmath/latest/...
Just no comparison, don't even @ me -
@devRancid Cry more lmao
I never said cgmath docs are perfect, but it doesn't even matter because it still lists exactly what I want to know
What? Your pea brain needs a 3 paragraph description for a function called "vec3" which takes x, y and z and returns a Vector3 like it isn't fucking obvious what it does?
Auto generated docs aren't the be all end all, but fuck me, 99.9% of non rust libs can't even manage *that* -
It's truly astonishing how rust fanboys defend a steaming pile of shit
How about you drink less soy milk and use a real language (C/C++), or is your pea brain too small to write bug/vulnerability-free code? -
@devRancid WIth all due respect, you're just willfully ignorant because you are afraid Rust will overtake you
And if that's you're attitude, at some point it will
I was a retarded Rust hater just like you at some point. Then I got over my ego and started learning it, and I'm not looking back
Not that Rust is the answer to everything. It has it's issues, both big and small, but you are so blinded by the fear of unknown that you can't even acknowledge the language for what it is. Sad -
-
@Demolishun Wasn't trying to be mean! I like cppreference a lot, but it's only for std
That's exactly why I'm so grateful for Rust having a good docs story for all libraries -
@12bitfloat no, not upset, I noticed the fight after I posted. I thought it was hilarious.
Edit: gotta upvote this shit and get some more contenders in here! -
atheist98402d@12bitfloat what you're saying is great about autogenerated docs sounds an awful lot like intellisense of an ide which most languages have an lsp now so works. What have I missed?
-
retoor116382dIt makes your cat ears hang huh? :) Considered mkdocs with the read the docs template? They look like the rust one
-
@atheist Auto complete doesn't give you a full overview of all types, functions, etc
... and of course you need to first add the dependency to your project
Sometimes you just want to see how a few libs are designed so you can choose which one you like best. No problem with docs.rs
Related Rants
Man going from Rust to other languages is making me go insane
Why does no other language have a high quality, standard documentation tool!? I just want to know what classes and functions you have ðŸ˜
rant
rust