Hey all, not sure what the mod rules are around this but.. I'd love some feedback on my project..

This project, I call it Thingtime, is my life's work..

It's a GUI for web development with a direct connection to HTML, CSS and JavaScript using React and Chakra UI..

It's like writing code and adding it to a runtime while being in that runtime, and that runtime is powering itself..

So, it aims to fully elliminate the gap between code editors and the end result.. I jokingly refer to it as code-no-code.

Anyway, it's a long 13 minute video which goes over the basics to a pretty cool demo..

I'm trying to work out what direction to take with the platform and idea.. private investment, shares, crowdfunding.. etc..

So I was hoping for some input from some fellow 9000 IQ devrant degenerates..

Here's the vid !!! 🥰
https://youtube.com/watch/...

Lopu 🌈💖✨♾️✨💖🦄

This is totally allowed as long hand crafted imho. Basically, AFAIK the only rule here is no politics. Very cool BTW. Will watch it now and will let you know what I think about it. It's time for a beer anyway.

@lopu the product feels decent. I do have a few remarks:

consider also accepting int instead of number.

consider also accepting bool instead of boolean.

consider also accepting list instead of array.

But while accepting multiple values of value types, convert it to the correct value ofc (convert int to number if int is inputted).

For who is the application? A designer or programmer? The way you choose color kinda requires some CSS knowledge.

Prefixing with hidden is nice, but if it is designed for technical person, maybe using the '.' in front of it is also and idea.

So, on the left side you have the preview content. Can i click on it to select te right element for editing? I think it's not hard to make while offering great functionality.

Also, I got stuck, maybe I missed something, but i do "cat = undefined" and I expected what I see on screen, but whereever i click, i don't get it to edit mode to change the 'imagine' text what made me upset. j/k.

@lopu i do really appreciate dem video, You do it well. But if you want to prove your product, tell also for who it is. Who's life are you trying to make easier? Also, there's another way of proving your product: make a twitter-like feed using it. How much time does it take, is it even possible? Give a user an idea what he can create with it. The video is an example that your product works. You also need a video that your product is benefitial.

I have written software to check if there was AI involved of the source code of app and: The entire content is human-generated with no AI involvement. That's nice. But now, is it somewhere on github? I can review source, maybe even today. The review quality is good in technical essence. See the review quality of https://retoor.molodetz.nl/retoor/.... This is a project made by @Lensflare and got reviewed by my system. It will give your product a grade based on a review per source file. See the .reviews directory.

@retoor 😍😍😍😍😍😍

Thanks for watching the vid!!!!!!! 🥰

CAT={ PURRING: TRUE }

https://imgur.com/a/WtfAqWd

Yeah sooooo, the goal was to make it map 1:1 with all javascript types, so boolean/bool, string, number, array, object y'know ?

Abstract types/classes can be added and extended but that would go into the realm of a superset programming language, currently I just want to match javascript existing capabilities as much as possible 😂

Yeah the application is meant for both designer and developer, I envision a more designer friendly interface with color pickers and etc, like on figma.

Figma has added their latest variables stuff which is just about touching on Thingtime's capabilities but in my opinion Thingtime is more developer friendly as it maps Javascript 1:1 !!!

But I'm 1 person at the moment compared to a massive company !

@lopu that 1 person thing is not a problem. Just use drugs.

Anyway, fack. I did know about that edit button. But it only shows up if you search it again? I mean, if i do pony=undefined and i go to that thing, i can do whatever i want, but no edit button.

Very funny, i used the word wieuw and it existed already, you use that word too appearantly. What are the odds?

imgur is for noobs. Pro's use https://devrant.molodetz.nl for uploading video's and stuff that Ostream (fellow ranter) likes. Ostream is smart, i couldn't prevent him uploading certain content there with a captcha.

I've sent the cat.

@retoor

I'm debating open sourcing it ... 👀

I probably should hey...

@retoor Also for some reason I can't respond with a length response so here's a pastebin..

https://pastebin.com/G8WQLAbe

@lopu just for two hours for the review of your life worth much €€€ 😁 I open source almost everything I write on my site. My site is just a bit more than a month old, had 30+ projects and there is more than 516 hours worked on it. No mercy, no life :)

@retoor

Here you are 😂

https://github.com/lopugit/...

I've been working on this (Only came up with the name Thingtime in 2021) since 2015 ! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Been through a few iterations of tech stacks and UI concepts..

Here's a very, very, VERY early screenshot 😂

This stack used just Vue.js lol

@retoor

Ohh 500 hours on the one site 😂😂😂😂😂

My goodness, I'll have a look 🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

@lopu cool, within two hours I have review for you and you can close it again if you want.

@lopu review process is running! Very much thanks, I didn't have support for mjs and ts yet. I do see a node_modules directory, I knew this would happen someday and my system already excluded that. Every big review costs me one or two cents in resources but imagine if it would scan a node modules directory! :P

Edit: I think it will be very OK based on first few files reviewed. You have a few files graded an eight so far what is VERY good. This system is very critical, but also very fair. The lowest score I ever had myself is a six, lowest score in total it had is a a four and my own projects are normally graded a six or seven on average. Also, it didn't find bugs in your code yet, the bug resolver is quite top notch.

@lopu if you want to make it closed again, you can do it. The review is still running, it's done on a clone on the repository. I will delete the repository afterwards so only you'll have the source. I think review takes 15 minutes more or so. You'll see it's very detailed. Myself, I normally only fix bugs / critical stuff. It's impossible to fix all issues that it does mention.

@retoor

That's all good ! I think I'll leave it open 😂

You know the important directory is the remix directory that's the GUI and stuff !

I haven't linked the backend to the frontend yet hahaha 😂

Thanks so much for running a review 🥹

I can't wait to see the results !!

@Retoor you made this happen 😍

@lopu I knew my life had purpose.

I don't know how far review process is, I have to travel now for a hour. I'll keep you posted.

@lopu still reviewing, process got stuck. My process often does more than 30.000 tokens per minute, get's a server side error and just hangs. It hanged all the time, but it just continues where it left of. So running again. I expect 15 minutes left or so.

@lopu here it is, check the .md files: https://molodetz.nl/retoor/...

The most important part - the summary misses because a flaw in the system :( I have to figure that out but I don't have time for that now :( But anyway, for so far I've seen, your source code is written well according to review. Six is good, Eight is awesome, I also did see a 9 somewhere, and that's extreme. A 10 never happened.