If c++ is so good, why isn't there a c++++ or c++2? 😏😏😏 - devRant

Ranter

Comments

13

j4cobgarby

8094

6y

Well there's c++11
35

7400

2820

6y

Well if you arrange the 4 +s right, you get C#
3

ElToastGrande

652

6y

Actually there's D
But it's been all proprietary since lately, and thus not so popular and heavily used.
But C++ has also grown a lot, through newer standards(as mentioned by @j4cobgarby )
1

Devnergy

6250

6y

@7400 mind blown C#
0

7400

2820

6y

@FrodoSwaggins That doesn't seem to be the philosophy of C++, though (although they started to remove stuff lately).
1

AleCx04

28728

6y

You legit answered your own question bro. Because c++ is already good enough
1

martikyan

1772

6y

Because C++ is so good that C++2-like projects has not been succeeded.
1

jpichardo

7391

6y

@7400 @Devnergy if I remember right thats the reason behind thr pound sign ;p
0

fullsnack-dev

2504

6y

Hahaha checkmate.
1

SuryaK

1420

6y

There's a c++17
0

netikras

34558

6y

Because it is SO good as c++ v1 it does not need v2 :)
2

host127001

1472

6y

How about a ++C++ ?
0

smykolas

131

6y

@host127001 that sounds perfect 😍😍
2

Proximyst

2145

6y

Thats why we have Rust

*runs*

devRant © 2021 Hexical Labs LLC
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service