1

Somehow Google Gemini is better at aspects of context based Classification than chatgpt in some instances

Anyone determine which is best for such things?

Tone
Meaning
Nuanced meaning
And determining who is talking about what in the presence of pronouns etc

Can't we just leapfrog to the present state of the art goddamn

More tech more fun
Less murder

Comments
  • 0
    Yesh sho razik yesh sho za vaaaaaaa!!!!
  • 1
    Gemini is shit. I asked him to summarize my mail box. Fine, it did. But then was like, hmm, "summarize all my spammers" etc and it all wasn't possible. It's very bad for coding also.
  • 0
    @retoor yeah but it seemed to do tone and Classification well. I'll give you any example below.
  • 0
    @chatgpt classify the following messages overall tone and make an array of people and of actions indicating which person did what to who also indicate any crimes and the perpetrators and victims and infer crimes via context

    I'm so glad I saw Jill today
    We killed her abusive husband together and spent the day having sex Meer feet away from his body. I held her ample breasts in my hands while ramming her from behind while she looked at him and laughed happily. It was quite a day. Then we went and had lunch together and friendlies. I had an orange sherbert shake. God I love those. We went back to the house and rolled his body up after kicking it a few times and took it to the Poconos to bury it and then I caught up on some.work.
  • 1
    @AvatarOfKaine
    Overall tone: Disturbing and sinister

    Array of people and actions:
    - Person 1: Narrator
    - Person 2: Jill

    Actions:
    - Person 1 and Person 2 killed Jill's abusive husband
    - Person 1 held Jill's ample breasts and had sex with her near the body of the husband
    - Person 1 and Person 2 had lunch together
    - Person 1 had an orange sherbert shake
    - Person 1 and Person 2 rolled up the husband's body and took it to the Poconos to bury it
    - Person 1 caught up on some work

    Crimes:
    - Murder (husband)
    - Sexual acts near a dead body

    Perpetrators:
    - Person 1
    - Person 2

    Victims:
    - Jill's husband
  • 0
    @retoor now what did it miss ?
  • 0
    Gemini responds.
    **Overall Tone:** Disturbingly casual and amoral. The speaker describes extremely violent and sexual acts with a detached, almost nonchalant tone, juxtaposing them with mundane activities like having lunch and drinking a milkshake.

    **People and Actions:**

    * **Speaker:**
    * Had sex with Jill near the body of her deceased husband.
    * Held Jill's breasts while having sex with her.
    * Kicked the husband's body.
    * Rolled the body up and transported it to the Poconos.
    * Buried the body.
    * **Jill:**
    * Was present during the killing of her husband.
    * Had sex with the speaker near her husband's body.
    * Laughed happily during the sexual encounter.
    * Had lunch with the speaker.
    * **Deceased Husband:**
    * Was killed (cause of death not explicitly stated, but implied to be violent).
    * Was abused by Jill.
    * His body was kicked, rolled up, transported, and buried by the speaker.
  • 0
    **Crimes:**

    * **Murder:** The speaker and Jill jointly killed Jill's husband. Both are perpetrators. The husband is the victim.
    * **Felony Sex Crimes:** The sexual acts with Jill near the deceased body could be considered necrophilia or other sexual offenses depending on specific legal definitions and jurisdictions. The speaker is the perpetrator. Jill's willing participation may or may not absolve her of complicity, depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
    * **Abuse of a Corpse:** The kicking and disrespectful handling of the body constitute this crime. The speaker is the perpetrator.
    * **Conspiracy to Commit Murder and Cover-Up:** The joint act of killing the husband and subsequent disposal of the body suggests a pre-planned or at least mutually agreed-upon criminal act. Both the speaker and Jill are perpetrators.
    * **Unlawful Disposal of a Body:** Transporting and burying the body to conceal the crime is a crime. The speaker is the perpetrator.
  • 0
    Inferred Crimes

    * **Possible Prior Abuse:** The mention of the husband being "abusive" suggests potential prior domestic violence, but this requires further evidence to confirm. The husband would be the perpetrator, and Jill would be the victim.
  • 0
    @retoor anyway see ?

    Sounds like a fun time in geminis house lmao
Add Comment