Do all the things like ++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatarSign Up
thatsnotnice736191dbeware that now you're cursed, if you don't embrace reactive programming and spread the word about how good avocados are within 21h , a team of hipsters will popup in your office with their beards, colorful stuff and trendy buzzwords.
seems a joke, but it's not
thatsnotnice736191dok, really, rx to me justifies the overhead
there're almost no cases where complexity is low enough to make reactive approach pointless (maybe code challenges...)
i don't know the swift scene very well, but 40K lines seem quite something tho
@thatsnotnice loved the first response.
Re second: I dunno. There’s only a small handful of use cases so far where I’ve said “oh cool that will save some time”. The rest I don’t necessarily as an improvement, just a different way of doing it. I still think I could replicate the few useful things another way and not introduce 40k lines of code into the app
Your Job Suck?
Take a quick quiz from Triplebyte to skip the job search hassles and jump to final interviews at hot tech firms
Get a Better Job
arwinneil37Just found the best dev ever. https://alcohollick.com/tfw.html
dfox105As a long-time iPhone user, I am really sorry to say it but I think Apple has completed their transition to be...
rizasif9230Apple rejected my app, because they throught there was a frickin Windows phone on my loading screen. How inse...