Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
![](/static/devrant/img/pipeless-devrant-banner-white.png)
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
xroad23808yIt's not technically wrong, just harder to read. And anything that reduces code readability is crappy code
-
@spl0 i need an official code bible that says that it's wrong. it's the same for a compiler, which killed my argument against them, but too many bells are ringing in my head when i see that syntax
-
LLAMS37518y@applejag read Clean Code by Robert C. Martin.
Closest thing to a Code Bible that exists on this earth -
spl020438yC has used for(;;) for a while(1) loop for as long as I can remember....
It doesn't look odd to me.
Related Rants
during a programming introduction course on loops my pals started writing `for` loops instead of `while` loops like so:
`for (;expression;) {}`
spent weeks explaining why it's wrong. needless to say, they still do it. had to hinder myself from ripping my hair off my head
undefined
so many tags
you dense
waiting for that markdown
wk17
why do that
c++