It just hit me. Companies that badly want to use A.I. are really trying to cover for their mass incompetence.

Or this is actually what made them incompetent. I have made now an system made myself more efficient than roocode. But it still needs a good developer to instruct it. I think that will never change. So many paths to Rome for such automated process. AI is dead and don't really want something. It needs to be instructed by someone who really wants something.

I mean everyone always is trying to cover for their mass incompetence

it's the human condition. animal condition. living organism condition

I also try to cover for my incompetence 😭

@jestdotty Hm... I only sometimes do that. Mostly I'm just directly honest, not to my benefit. lol

@jestdotty Not the animals.

@afaIk is that why retoor feeds burgers to cows 🤔

@BordedDev "This is a rat burger?"

@CaptainRant Is that the american version of the chinese cat burger?

(I can't place the reference)

Many companies are also doing it because of their high level of competence.

@BordedDev No, it's when in the movie Demolition Man (1993, Stallone, Snipes) the underground resistance people in the future had to make burgers out of rats because eating animal meat was outlawed (as they understood fats killed people faster).

Video:

https://youtube.com/watch/...

@CaptainRant Oh that's it, I haven't watched the movie but seen clips

Nah.

Plenty of great companies right now are comfortable with their quality but they just hedging their bets.

The reasoning is "AI does not seem all that great. We produce quality stuff. Buuuut maybe we are too short sighted. We don't wanna end up like Kodak when they thought film was superior to digital photos. So let's hop on the AI-train just to be safe that we are not missing out."

And then it may often end up seeming desperate cause you have someone saying "Let's just see if we can get ahead of this AI-shit, let's put an AI-feature on the front page just to get stakeholders to stop yapping about how we lack AI"