Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
You mean just adding "virtual" to the method? You should be rejoicing that you have real properties.
-
To make things really clear and to avoid accidental fuck ups; be it by you or some-one else if you're working on a team...?
-
Also, you don't have to use virtual/override; you can just shadow the base implementation by adding a method with the same signature (to which your ide should say "hey, add a new keyword if you really wanted to do that but if you don't that's cool too")
Related Rants

Coworker's whiteboard today
Coming from a Java background learning C#.
The only question is, why? Why do I have to be so verbose when defining 'virtual' methods?
random
c#
java