Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
				++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
				Sign Up
			Pipeless API
 
				From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
				Learn More
			Comments
		
- 
				
				My coding acumen is too rusty to actually put the result to my mind, but let's be honest : He's talking about sex.
 
 We know he's talking about sex.
 
 We know what's going on here.
- 
				
				@DarthGuappi No way.
 
 He''s talking bout putting his wiener in a hotdog?
 
 Put the love glove in the treasure trove?
 
 Buttering the biscuit?
 
 Sweep the chimney?
 
 No way that could ever be.
- 
				
				@IntrusionCM *takes off shades and leers seductively*. . . .You know, you lookin pretty good homie.
- 
				
				
- 
				
				@IntrusionCM *SLAMS HANDS ON TABLE* . . .I'm going to ask you a very simple question and I want an answer. . . .Who. . .Told. . .You?
- 
				
				@DarthGuappi If I could remember all that stuff... By the way - do you know my name?
- 
				
				@IntrusionCM I know when you are sleeping. . .I know when you're awake. . .I know when you've been bad or good and according to my list you have been a very naughty boi- Okay, I can't do this bit anymore. You win.
Related Rants







 What only relying on JavaScript for HTML form input validation looks like
What only relying on JavaScript for HTML form input validation looks like
 Found something true as 1 == 1
Found something true as 1 == 1
I wouldn't mind having some (.3).toString(36).substring(2,5) rn.
random
js