361

Stages of learning angular js
1. Wtf
2. I think I get it.
3. Wtf

Comments
  • 4
    That's not tru unless u learn angular 1.x. Go to 4 it's really dope
  • 3
  • 3
    I couldnt even bring angular 4 quick-start to life. 🤓
  • 2
    Once you understand scope im angular everything gets easier
  • 1
    I am currently between 1 and 2.
  • 17
    Stages of learning React:
    1. wow
    2. wow
    3. wow
  • 26
    You forgot to mention the longest step:
    Step 0: decide to use Angular or React or Vue or Meteor or Ember or jQuery or Backbone or Batmobile or Spongebob or Naruto or Cheetos
  • 0
    @kudamalam all of those are different tools 😂😂😂. Though true, a hammer or a mallet..mhmm
  • 6
    More like:
    1. Wtf?
    2. Oh, I think I understand.
    3. I can build a basic to do list.
    4. I can build a solid a....
    ... 5. Angular 2 is out.
  • 2
    Well tbh angular 1.x yeah... The mystery box that kept on giving.. but angular 2+ has been mostly intuative... (Mostly)
  • 4
    Am I the only dev in the world that never had a hard time with Angular.js? I find it really easy to use and grasp. Their API is very well documented, I hardly had to read any tuts, save for third party libraries on Scotch.io but really?
  • 0
    Triple plus. I was thinking about this this morning. I intentionally choose not to memorize how to work with Angular 1.x because after resolving each stupid gremlin I remember thinking, yeah, this was way too over engineered. Like let's take the fun of memorize trig formulas and put that into code.
  • 3
    @nicholai you're not alone. Directives scared me at first until I spent a day with it, and realised it was just misunderstood. Aren't we all?
  • 0
    @ronakkaria right? The only counter-intuitive thing I stumbled upon is the symbols for specifying data bindings. Like. They couldve been words like evaluate, one and two, but again, the docs are clear on usage
  • 0
    @nicholai I thought transcludes were pretty tricky (when you want to do something complex.. can't remember what now. Been long since I used it). But that's fair enough.. it's a feature of the framework you'll rarely use.
  • 0
    Is it better to start from angular 2? Or maybe 4? Idk angular 1 is a bit messy for me
  • 1
    @wOnzky yea whatever the latest is.. why would you use angular 2?
  • 0
    @burmesepornstar
    Thanks! That make sense :) I'll check out lastes ver
  • 0
    What I see is "ng-" which means "not good".
    ...
    4. Wtf
  • 0
    Try Angular 5 to 6....

    More wtf.... !!!!!!!!
  • 0
    I had the same impression with nativeScript Vue:

    _ cool stuff

    _ wow

    _ wtf

    _ [ I started to learn React ]
  • 0
    @the224 really?

    I use AngularJS and it's quite ok.

    I'm curious about the more recent versions...but they're very similar to React
  • 0
    @tiuscia it's totally different
Add Comment