Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
Comments
-
DEVil6669133y@IntrusionCM Our IT management doesn't want to give it to us so we have to resort to very ugly things such as emailing JARs around or worse, including a whole microservice inside another as JAR.
-
If you're including one microservice inside another as a jar, then... well, I don't know what that is, but it sure as hell ain't a microservice.
Is this a suit with 0 programming knowledge mandating these decisions because he saw a video on YouTube or something? -
@AlmondSauce he said sharing the code duplication.
Libraries / Frameworks / Common code cannot be shared via an versioned JAR as artifactory / registry is missing.
Makes sense? -
It makes sense conceptually, but it's nuts. By all means extract common code and shove it in a repository that you reference from elsewhere, but not the entire microservice as a hard coded jar. I'd prefer code duplication than that nonsense.
If you work somewhere that refuses to give you the basic tools needed to do your job, it's not a great sign. -
DEVil6669133y@AlmondSauce our pipelines cannot “see” external Git repositories but only the repository in which the micro service code is stored
Related Rants
The big enterprise in which I work wants to mandate which we have to write a microservice for each individual HTTP endpoint, since we cannot even have an artifactory for code sharing the code duplication is going off the charts and having these microservices sharing a single DB we are creating a big and messy distributed monolith.
rant
microservices
enterprise
java