Ranter
Join devRant
Do all the things like
				++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
				Sign Up
			Pipeless API
 
				From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
				Learn More
			Comments
		
- 
				
				 Root772323y@connormon No, it’s okay! We know what you meant from the tag. I just don’t have an opinion on it. Root772323y@connormon No, it’s okay! We know what you meant from the tag. I just don’t have an opinion on it.
- 
				
				Another day, another framework. Expecting a random company expect to put this in their job description -> ”candidate MUST have 10 years of experience in developing apps with Bun framework "
- 
				
				@johnmelodyme Idk what you're talking about. I've already got 19 years in it before my 19th birthday!
- 
				
				 joas18503yHaven't tried Bun. I like Deno . I don't like Node so much. So if Bun is new Node, I don't like Bun. joas18503yHaven't tried Bun. I like Deno . I don't like Node so much. So if Bun is new Node, I don't like Bun.
- 
				
				I really like that it has TCO. Every JS engine should have TCO. JS could still be a decent functional scripting language if the W3C committed to functional features.
- 
				
				Looks surprisingly fast but I'd probably still go with Deno. Or just not use JavaScript at all
Related Rants








 What only relying on JavaScript for HTML form input validation looks like
What only relying on JavaScript for HTML form input validation looks like
 Found something true as 1 == 1
Found something true as 1 == 1
What do you all think about Bun?
question
js
runtime
bun