There are so many things I don't understand the point of in technology

Like microservices

There are other things I just have difficulty comprehending like natural language models

Let's focus on that one.

From the explanation I saw it takes presence of words in typical language

So what the input neurons representing every word in the English dictionary?

The message gets changed to this and the output neurons are the existence of these words likely as a response to the input and BAM chatgpt converts output weighta somehow to full sentences and paragraphs?

I feel I'm missing some important point

Is there well documented code anywhere?

I thought I was the only one who hated microservices lol

@azuredivay microservices simply aren't in any way a _technical_ decision, but a _managerial_ one. splitting a coherent project up intop tiny parts that are too separated from each other increases management overhead and allows "agile coaches" and "solution architects" and other buzzwords to justify their paychecks

@tosensei i certainly never saw them used

@tosensei

It also allows for a faster and scalable environment.
It is easier to replace people aswell.

I have seen the opposite, where people justify their paycheck because the massive blob of code is impossible to understand, so they can charge a shitton of money because they have made the company dependent on them

@Linux that's called job security

@Linux well, the opposite of a complete monolyth isn't perfect either. but one extreme being bad doesn't mean the other isn't.

as for "faster and scalable environment" - personnel-wise, yes.

but technology-wise, it's usually more like: development grinding to a halt because all developers are busy fixing stuff.

stuff that's broken because other teams, to quote them: "changed nothing".

with that nothing completely breaking production.

and with everything so over-compartmentalised that nobody knows who is responsible for what. so nothing gets done.

@Linux besides allows new guys some time to get used to their bullshit

I don't think breaking things into 1000 separate projects makes sense though.

Why not just create a more logically organized code base ?

@AvatarOfKaine creating a standard is easy but applying it all the time is hard.

@melezorus34 well if I remember correctly it has to be expanded as needed

Developing a complex c# desktop app was fun heh

And the design choices of the frontend we're very poor

Course they were trying to shove a lot of data on one display

@AvatarOfKaine with or without DevExpress? 😂

@melezorus34 what's that ? Lol

@AvatarOfKaine A WPF framework that is 99% pain in the ass and 1% helping you achieve something.

Especially when you take a build and try using it on another machine

@melezorus34 ohhh
No we used some other crappy set of controls

Teleric

I had looked them up a decade earlier before they sent me on along adventure to get me out of practice and put some douchebag no nothing whore in my place

Then one quick bout of amnesia later and it only took a few months to recover my mojo

Would have made more sense to leave me the hell alone

Altogether I'm getting fucked on my SSI retirement benefits because some scum fucks had to build this harmful system

When the brown haired former homo whore catches up he should have to deal with this situation for the real amount of time

That and others were this person's jobs not that assholes

They just had to create an excuse why he was slow by making me slow by letting me live doing other things that don't translate well to office life

@melezorus34 good news is now
Three to four states have to help this person and me brown haired imposter gets to fuck off for awhile

@tosensei

I guess we have seen two extremes in our careers :)

@Linux well, i'm in the hell of having to maintain a legacy² project of one extreme in an environment of the other extreme.

@tosensei and you say
I'm crazy

@tosensei same project three times?
Or same one you just started over and commented the same ?

@melezorus34 wpf enough said lol