8

Imagine a web way ahead of our time where its size goes beyond our imagination...

This is my first rant, and I'll cut to the chase! I don't like how web currently stands. Here's what makes me angry the most altough I know there's a myriad of solutions or workarounds:

- A gazillion credentials/accounts/services in your lifetime.

- Everyone tries to reinvent the wheel.

- There's no single source of truth.

- Why the fuck there's so much design in a vision that started as a network of documents? Why is it that we need to spend time and energy to absorb the page design before we can read what we are after?

- What's up with the JS front end frameworks?! MB's of code I need to download on every page I visit and the worse is the evaluation/parsing of it. Talk about acessibility and the energy bills. I don't freaking need a SPA just give a 20-50ms page load and I'm good to go!

- I understand that there's a whole market based on it but do we really need all that developer tools and services?

- Where's our privacy by the way? Why the fuck do I need ads? Can't I have a clue about what I wan't to buy?

Sticking with this points for now... Got plenty more to discuss though.

What I would like to see:

A unique account where i can subscribe services/forums/whatever. No credentials. Credentials should be on your hardware or OS. Desktop Browser and mobile versions sync everything seemlesly. Something like OpenID.

Each person has his account and a profile associated where I share only what I want with whom I want when I want to.

Sharing stuff individually with someone is easy and secure.

There's no more email system like we know. Email should be just email like it started to be. Why the hell are we allowing companies to send us so much freaking "look at me now, we are awesome", "hey hey buy from me".. Here's an idea, only humans should send emails. Any new email address that sends you an email automatically requests your "permission" to communicate with you. Like a friend request.

Oh by the way did I tell you that static mail is too old for us? What we need is dynamic email. Editing documents on the fly, together, realtime, on the freaking email. Better than mail, slack and google docs combined.

In order for that to work reasonably well, the individual "letter" communication would have to be revamped in a new modern approach.

What about the single source of truth I talked about? Well heres what we should do. Wikipedia (community) and Larry Page (concept) gave us tremendous help. We just need to do better now.

Take the spirit of wikipedia and the discoverability that a good search engine provides us and amp that to a bigger scale. A global encyclopedia about everything known to mankind. Content could be curated from us all just like a true a network.

In this new web, new browser or whatever needed to make this happen I could save whatever I want, notes, files, pictures... and have it as I left it from device to device.

Oh please make web simple again, not easy just simple and bigger.

I'm not old by the way and I don't see a problem with being older btw.

Those are just my stupid rants and ideas. They are worth nothing. What I know for sure is that I'll do something about or fail trying to.

Comments
  • 2
    Thank you! Email that asks you if you want to receive communication from the sender, and if you say no, it automatically blacklists the address. Hmmm.

    Welcome to devRant!
  • 1
    @iAmNaN Exactly! Perhaps further emails sent on a pending authorization wouldn't trigger any notification also. Avoids major problems with spam.
  • 3
    Unique computer id AND privacy?
    Surely you must be joking.
  • 4
    A single repository of all knowledge is equally scary because of the amount of spin and historic editing people are wont to do.

    The short of it: you cannot trust people.
  • 2
    You surely must have forgotten that Internet consists of people we see in Real Life, so it is fucked up like the real world is. And then enforcing single source of authentication is just not possible. Not everything is same nor built for the same purpose. Nobody trusts anybody. If you want to establish authenticity, you build it yourself or trust somebody else to do it for you (which works in some cases, but not all).

    And speaking about standards reminds of the xkcd joke, which is truer than how funny it is
  • 0
    @asgs link to joke?
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
    @asgs Single source of authentication is possible. Take a look at openID.. It just needs widespread use.
  • 0
    @Ashkin what I mean is decentralized. Something like every website geared towards some education being community editable/curated. And a search engine that provides facts results instead of links to pages.
  • 1
    @nickpapoutsis thank you my good man 😂😂😂. That is exactly how i believe things would play out
  • 0
    @danielsousaio yes, I'm aware of that. But that's what the problem is - adoption. Financial institutions like Banks wouldn't trust a third party to authenticate their customers.

    And since OpenId is just another standard, it is left to the service providers and identity providers. It is the implementation and adoption that hamper the way authentication is done
Add Comment