347

Aww Adobe😝

Comments
  • 1
    Yes!
  • 19
    Meanwhile, the cricket's song (chirp?) fill the uncomfortable silence between the world and Adobe...
  • 2
    Adobe's support sucks. It's no surprise no one cares
  • 5
    Apple killed flash.
  • 5
    Nobody cares because we all ditched it years ago. Adobe seems to have only caught on now...
  • 1
    Thank god Flash is over. That was cool at the time essentially for games ans crazy creative webdesigns. But we're really better with JS.
  • 1
    @Masta You think JS is good? Have you ever tried to execute
    ["10", "10", "10", "10"].map(parseInt); ?
    There are tons of examples like this... JS should be killed with fire !
  • 2
    Well... https://github.com/pakastin/... , some might disagree. A petition to open source flash.
  • 1
    @wil222 I looked into your example and found out it comes from the fact that .map passes 3 args elem, index, and the array to the function it applies and parseInt accepts up to 2 args the str to parse and the base in which it is written which causes it to return [10, NaN, 2, 3) so it's actually working as designed
  • 0
    @Hallelouia i know but you have you guessed that by reading the code? The type handling of JS is really messed up. This was just a small example illustrating that it is a bad language.
  • 1
    @wil222 I sure had to go read the doc but it's there for a reason, using functions not knowing how they work is not the best idea but i do it too and am also frustrated when shit don't work as I expect it to.
  • 0
    Sooooo goood
  • 0
    World: At last!
  • 1
  • 0
    Meanwhile in Apple HQ... should we wait this long for apple maps as well?
  • 0
    Now… how do we do this for Java?
  • 0
    @Jop- you are so naive... Had some financial crap using a Java applet for file upload and also a KVM/virtual terminal thingy that is a Java applet (wonder if rackspace still uses it, we no longer use rackspace)
Add Comment