33

There are two types of coders: those who shorten function to fun, and those who shorten function to func.

Comments
  • 1
    Luckily there is no restriction about the number of types a coder can be in that sentence, or I'd be feeling a bit schizophrenic right now đŸ™ƒ
  • 6
    How about ones who don't shorten function to anything.
  • 1
    I don't associate with people who function @skprog. #pun
  • 0
    umm… void?
  • 7
    () => {
    }
  • 1
    @clovisIrex

    I shorten function definitions to =.

    f 0=1;f n=n*f$n-1

    Everything is an expression.
  • 0
    And those who use tacit programming.
  • 1
    «I live for the func, I die for the func» - Biggie
  • 1
    fun = Kotlin
    func = Swift
    My life is fucked having to code in both :)
    Imagine all those func getting into kotlin and all those fun getting into swift ...
  • 2
    *You don't have to use names if you use lambdas*
  • 1
    Func ist the only acceptable... When I want to have 'fun' I play games or go outside!
  • 0
    and then there r assholes who don't understand​ the concept of dividing code in functions.
  • 0
    How do you guys like fn?
  • 0
    @theScientist Erlang uses fun.
    Why is this worth mentioning?
  • 0
    @theScientist first attempt?
    Well, you can only improve yourself.
  • 0
    I tried for years before I could make someone laugh. and yes, when it came down to it, the laugh was at my accomplishments. @theScientist
  • 0
Add Comment