As CTO of an mid sized e-commerce agency I have to agree. The attitude in the industry is just awful. No one seems to want to tell the client that some things just aren't doable in x amount of time or x amount of money.
Generally there are a lot of agencies with terrible tech know-how. "cookie cutter templates" anyone :|

@Alice i understand your point

@futoricky will look into it the next days

also a helpful tool is https://regexr.com

@irene can't recall exactly but he showed me some java code and asked me something like 'what does this do'. I went through it line by line and then summarized the purpose.
He wanted an other answer

@C0D4 I'm currently evaluating alternatives. The for the link!

@C0D4 surprisingly, a relatively current one, they are just limiting access. Oh, and yes: you can have only one user per database whose permissions you can't set by yourself. it's just all messed up

@MurmeltierS *joins

@jonii they probably want you to make joints via '...WHERE table1.id = table2.id...'

.

i dont know about his IDE but if copy code out of Eclipse, the styling information gets copied aswell. still a dumb way to share code

@TRex belive me, there are a lot of people who call themselves Web Frontend Dev and can't point out the difference between a library and a framework :')

@cobolplz main point is: you really, really don't need jQuery (btw no framework) nor any framework to handle basic (or even non-rudimentary) DOM tasks. And if you are concerned about backwards compatibility you can always use a service like polyfill.io!

@gintko most of them probably aren't _working_ in the IT department, they _are_ the IT departmemt. No competition = no urge to develop new skills.

@Ratty and <title> is so to say "head-less" from now on?^^

.

.

.

but pleeeaaase don't use jquery. It was meant to standarize (DOM) functionality across Browsers. But now, with a very well standarized JS, there's absolutely no need to use jquery anymore.

Just using plain (vanilla) JS will do the job. (It's often times even easier to understand)

http://vanilla-js.com/

depends on your future use cases.
but i still vote for JS (Typescript)

wrong attitude

@sathya741 I really am hoping you are joking...

@linuxxx would it be possible to redirect font.google.com to an according mirror or is ssl standing in the way?

"it just makes sense"

same

but how is this even possible? ho can you "accidentally" produce this shit formatting (in css)

maybe use a vpn?

@trogus @dfox @dfoxmumcuzshessendingit

javascript == java
>true
javascript === java
>false

:')

@Mizz141 you're talking like this ist SO