why dont you go with a bang instead? take some hostages n livestream or something
more entertaining than starving .-.

@tosensei as @Lensflare said, a coordinated/automated malloc-free-ish behaviour directly in real-memory is what I thought they're going with
Coz just having runtime readily available with the DLL has always been supported with their "portable deployment"

Msft adds dynamic/runtime-changes/imports limitations in Native/AOT so maybe thats the direction they're aiming for and it's just not done yet

if they do manage that, it'd essentially be devoid of GC, or if you want to be strict with words, realtime GC?

@jiraTicket ofc not compilation lol my time isn't THAT precious yet :p
I assumed runtime benefits coz we'd be removing the VM overhead entirely, n if you're deploying serverside (so you know the machine instruction set), having a native, non-VM based backend code seems like it'd heavily reduce system load and increase response times

@tosensei @AlgoRythm My assumption was that if we're getting rid of the VM, and using direct memory access (pre-compiled for specific instruction set, nothing on-the-fly), we'd be relying much less on GC (would GC even exist then..?) and less virtual <--> real changes n it'd give a massive performance boost but the documentation https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/... doesnt mention much about it
Doesnt it make it similar to "deployment with runtime assemblies included"? like it aint MASSIVE then

@Lensflare it's for my playground/pet-project anyway, it exists to be re-written whenever I find something interesting lol

wouldnt that just be a dictionary? 🤓

america is what they portray USSR/China to be
they're just better at pretence

Religion is an inherent human tendency. You can't escape it
Even if you get rid of every religion in the world, humans will come up with new false gods

@retoor it's .NET xD n going by my experience with MSFT, if I try to go anti-pattern with its builds, it'll only get worse
@lorentz I thought it'd be in Solution settings, but surprisingly wasnt -.- followed this https://schwabencode.com/blog/2023/... and it builds like the old times now

@kiki I already did T__T n it's just stuck on "pending". Should change it to IndexEventually ffs

pregnant Sonic tattoo > this

i dont see how he's wrong, in the end everyone needs food on their plate n if clickbait helps achieve that, so be it

@retoor im curious now how it got hacked via client side .-. did the hacker overwrite client-side params?
did the PaymentGateway give you a token representing the transaction? if so, it's their headache and not your fault

stripe's SDK is straightforward, at least if you're doing it from the Server Side

V I N E
I
N
E

isnt there a "NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore" equivalent when deserialising?

@Demolishun very likely. Coz in my product's repo I saw a LOT of people who aren't in the company with 5-6 months of idless between them
So it'd be easier for them to hire, get it refurbished every few months, fire and save on salaries.

PS: their 2nd highest selling product is a wrapper around a FREE, OpenSource product which they download as code, compile and obfuscate to hide the illegality. Then sell it at 4k USD/month to enterprise

leeches of the highest order.

@retoor beyond fucked.
At least in your case you've a valid reason, here coz the company hid its incompetence and put the blame on me, so MY career/record is ruined.

If I had not put in effort, I wouldn't care.
But the marketting dept will send out a "Amazing Product update with 20x performance increase!!!" newsletter this week. THAT I SOLO-ED. And I won't even be in the company when it goes out.

Legit used-and-thrown.

window on a server? so a GUI to visualise a server?

Just add a WinUI3 project to your solution, it can import the same C# services your backend is using (if u put them in their own Class Library at least)

with simple XAML u can have an usable GUI in no time

ANND if u didnt segregate the services into DLLs, then make your GUI make Http calls to your API, cud be local if ur server is local

Or over IP if ur exposing it

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/...

Winter isnt a worldwide occurance, so no
🐕🐶🐩🐕‍🦺 gang ftw 😤

artsy goth gf >>>> everything else

I MISSED YOU SPAM 😩😩😩💦

I miss spam :(

thats literally all the browsers rn
what u even talking about 💀

@jestdotty nah as if I'll burn system resources on video stream -,-
But I did add User2User chat so if they wanna get fiesty in private, go for it

@Ranchonyx An audience engagement platform! Basically everything I miss from 2010s internet
Where you could go on a site and just "talk" to faceless people who share interests and never talk to them again n not care

no hassle of account verification or no-no words

Since it's raw websockets n no ew-sockets-io, I add fun features like message emoji reactions, voice and image messages, and soon will add a "twitter live" kinda thing but embeddable
So now u open your niche app, there's a 24x7 live voice chat of whoever wants to join xD Wanna blast the "Nigga" on repeat in the sound of Microsoft George? go for it!

I pack it all up with corporate checks so fancy companies can restrict things by ToS, while avg devs can embed n do whatever (i.e., have fun)

Rn I embedded the live-chat feature on 2 of my apps as "Dog fooding", each time a user opens the app, the library makes a WebSocket connection to initialise the widget, which marks a session and thats what we see there

@Liebranca dying in war is always glorious
I await the day my gandhi-dick-sucking country goes through it so I get to experience a beautiful death

you're living the dream, you're lucky

welcome to war bruh

Hitler looking down from above: he just like me frfr

@retoor I legit thought TS enforces strictness at least for this level

My TS use is UI-only so such fuckups are tolerable to some extent
Knowing that ppl write entire backends in JS/TS makes me shiver ~_~

Id be anxious all day about every damn function/call