From Scratch? Sorry for your pain.

Just kidding, I understand what you meant. 😂

@Shardj the function parameters have explicit types (numbers, whatever that is in this context).

it’s something that’s usually not done in plain js, since everything is explicitly just a var.

i don’t have enough exposure to js to have seen it written this way. and as I suspected, there are hints of typescript.

Oh man, oh man, not again...

@Devnergy Yes, they released the patch with this new setting about 2 weeks ago. I opened the app, saw the notification, quickly swiped it away and then realized what I had just read. Haha

@senzory YT recently added it to the settings of their mobile app.

I saw fractals in the thumbnail preview. Was somewhat disappointed. :(

Nice rant though.

*insert RNN > CNN joke here*

I too like wordspaces. 😉

What language is this? Looks like Java but with JS syntax? Typescript?

Come on, it’s 2018, the correct answer is emacs. 😊

@Gobbas you duck, use geese.

@irene Sad that I didn’t change your mind. Hehe

Thanks for the laugh though.

@irene correction: It’s very basic and simple but not dumb. This type of humour is aware that it is using the tropes and repetitive gags of what would be considered currently in vogue, or “woke” or “cool,” and forces it in your face, intentionally making it cringey. Personally, I find that hilarious; making fun of something you don’t necessarily like or hate by using it excessively. It’s just silly... but not dumb. :)

*insert meme of “discord patch notes are dumb - change my mind” * 😋

Edit: then again, upon realization, you are allowed to hold your opinion so excuse my rant, hehe. 😅

@filthyranter fine! i'll consider it, you filthyranter.

@filthyranter no. :)

Somehow this reminds me of Silicon Valley with Mark being Gavin.

Hopefully he doesn’t get booted out of his own company.

@pacohojaverde C#?

P.S. - if it is, I could tell from its resemblance to Java syntax but its application of UpperCamelCase to everything.

Edit: just noticed the “*.cs” in the console to the right. 😂

Just like you, @bittersweet, this truly is bittersweet. 😂

Nice write-up.

@Condor sorry I messed it up. 😅

@Condor I made your ++ no longer a palindrome. Hehehehe

@irene I think @namenlossss is talking about me (my screenshot). 😅

@Floydian yes, that setting. I’m yet to try the last one, hehe.

@Floydian haha, I actually just found the dark theme section earlier today. Currently testing it out. :)

Binary’a fine for numbers (smaller set of reversible states based on a combination of digits from 0-9).

It quickly becomes tedious for text. Some might say exponentially tedious. 👀😂

*proceeds to shank the bloke in the leg*

“So, it bleeds...” hehehe

@Floydian for your viewing pleasure, kind stranger. :)

Unless you were referring to something else. If so, what’d you mean? 😅

I was partially wrong. Because “abc” is in fact a literal/constant in this case, it is interned. So another string literal can be compared using ==, but a string object can’t (you have to use .equals())

String aWord = “abc”;
String bWord = new String(“abc”);

aWord == “abc”; //true aWord == bWord; //false
bWord == “abc”; //false
bWord.equals(“abc”); //true

“ABC” is a literal, probably initialized in the stack (Java has a funky way of storing objects that aren’t instantiated).

word, I’m guessing is an object. Their address will definitely not be the same. Their value might.

.equals() FTW

hehe.

Depends on if we’re going by the IEEE754, where signed binary numbers are a thing.

It’s tough to make that jump because everything implicitly has a 0 in front of it.

1 is the significant bit (no pun intended).

@AlexDeLarge I do !hate you. :)