@CoreFusionX I try using cash anyway. To avoid supporting central banks.

@D-4got10-01 Google is an example for "You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain."

Android used to be the escape from proprietary walled gardens, but now it is becoming just that. And as always, Google uses their much loved p-word to justify it: "protect".

And people get fearmongered into accepting those draconian restrictions on their freedoms.

@D-4got10-01 Only a matter of time until Google releases an update that breaks it.

@merillecuz I have a better idea for you, spammer!

How about you kindly go

root@h4xorZ:/root # fsck _

yourself?

Thank you.

@OliviaMendez Hey, SpamGPT. Kindly go

$ fsck_

yourself.

Thank you.

@scor But it's not out of the box. It's not like you can plug in an ext4 USB stick and have it immediately appear in Windows Explorer.

But respects to Microsoft for doing this at all. Better than nothing.

https://bleepingcomputer.com/news/...

@jestdotty So that's why Google eliminated MicroSD card write access to third-party apps in Android 4.4.

The excuse stated by Google for this restriction is to prevent apps from leaving junk files behind after uninstallation.

But strangely, they didn't apply this argument to the internal storage, even though internal storage is smaller so the same junk files would take a higher percentage of the space.

It would have been best for Google to simply give the user a choice if they even want this restriction, but they did not. Google thinks its users are little babies who can't think for themselves.

MicroSD card support used to be one of the greatest selling points of Android smartphones over iPhones.

@CoreFusionX What about people with a disability? They deserve a second chance at life.

Why Google's file manager is garbage:

- Lacks a draggable scroll bar. Windows Mobile had this in 2009.

- Doesn't stay in same directory after tapping "copy" or "move". Instead goes to Download folder.

- "Properties" feature can't count total files and size in a directory.

- No A-to-B range selection which is like shift+click on desktop. Only added "drag to select" in recent years.

- Only up to 24 search results.

- Doesn't make use of Android's native "trash" (recycle bin) feature.

- No bookmarks.

- No "copy path to clipboard".

- Can't jump to parent directory of a search result.

- Does not remember sorting preference.

- Can not limit search to a single directory.

- More reasons.

Google has to admit Microsoft is much better at file managers than them.

@Lensflare Indeed, but that wastes battery charge and I might need to log in again.

It is more convenient to have all useful features in one browser.

+1

@Lensflare Pages are taken down all the time, as anyone not new to the Internet knows.

@electrineer Yes, but it is a whack-a-mole game with Google.

Google makes changes with Android updates that screw over third-party file managers.

https://dontkillmyapp.com/

> "WHO THE FUCK NEEDS THAT MUCH STORAGE IN THEIR PHONE?!!"

You when you use the camera a lot and don't want to spend a second worrying about how much space you have remaining.

More space = progress = good.

I once had a 32 GB smartphone and it was a nightmare.

Never worrying about ENOSPC.

Also, MicroSD guards against data loss if your USB port breaks.

Which browser?

Firefox: about:config > javascript.enabled

In Chrome, it should be in "Privacy and security" > "site settings", or just "site settings".

@netikras A bot gives a better response than humans? Mind blown.

Perhaps the creators of tar hate Tarl Warwick, so they avoided "tar -l".

Edit: Nah, impossible. tar was made before Tarl was born.

I have a better idea:

Say "fsck you" to the Mr. Einstein who had the idea to copycat "pull to refresh" from the Twitter app.

"But remember, it's just for your protection bruh!!1!"

@c3r38r170 Another thing:

If I am at the top, pull-to-refresh even prevents me from scrolling down if I swiped up ever so slightly before swiping down.

Avoiding pull-to-refresh is a dizzying walk on eggshells. It prevents enjoying web browsing relaxed.

A screen-sized refresh button is an anti-feature which needs to be eliminated everywhere.

Hey spammer.

Go FSCK yourself.

Yes, you heard it right. FSCK. With an S.

"Bitches"?

You must have confused us with BitchUte.

BitchUte is here, if you are looking for it: https://BitchUte.com

Will you make it possible for us to OS-stream operating systems from Steam?

@devRancid With progressive enhancement (HTML first, then JavaScript), the useful content loads first.

With a JavaScript app, the useful content loads last. Only after all those megabyte-sized JavaScript files.

@kiki In the comments :-)

@black-kite A lightweight static version could be displayed instead of an error message if the JS framework fails.

The JS framework just needs to hide itself if it detects it failed.

@devRancid Read my post again.

JavaScript is an enhancement, not a replacement.

This means the initial page load is via HTML, but enhancements such as posting comments without reloading the page are done via JavaScript.

@c3r38r170 That's my point. If it takes skill to avoid the entire screen as a refresh button, it is an admission that pull-to-refresh is undesirable.

Just over 2000 other people think so too:

https://support.google.com/chrome/...

@K-ASS You misspelled fsck.