Details
Joined devRant on 1/20/2020
Join devRant
Do all the things like
++ or -- rants, post your own rants, comment on others' rants and build your customized dev avatar
Sign Up
Pipeless API
From the creators of devRant, Pipeless lets you power real-time personalized recommendations and activity feeds using a simple API
Learn More
-
I don't know what's up with some of you, but I didn t ask for a security audit. I think I do it okay but you can have your opinion.
I, personally, don't like to depend on a third party platform to get my passwords. I have dozens of unique passwords and I am happy about that.
On that note, I think I've had enough of that rant. -
@Oktokolo sites such as these impose pw requirements making it impossible to use throw away pws
Sometime they even prevent the use of my algorithm because they prevent specific symbols or impose a particular number of capital or lower case caracters -
@Nihil75 I have a base password which I make various versions of according to an algorithm that I alone know. You're assuming wrong.
People arround tend to come to conclusions pretty fast...
I like to use a simple throw away pw on shit I know I will not use to pay or store important data. I use a separate email for these uses. It's simpler to remember and faster. -
Are you guys assuming that I use 1234 as pw?
I have an algorithm in my head. It's just tideous to come up with a new pw on every website.
On pw managers: Don't you find it ironic that your security relies on one single entity? If it fails, it's gg for every websites. If it's down, you can't login.
Anyway, pw manager guys, you miss the point of my rant. I was talking about my anoyment of the equivalent of putting an overkill 2000$ lock on a rundown shed with broken windows. Not asking question about where I can find lock providers and how irresponsible I am for making my own secure locks. -
@electrineer oof, so raw
-
@Voxera I tried using a pw manager. Used their function to generate random pw. Found that it's not that useful to use when using another pc. Even more when you gotta use your master pw to log on the pw manager on foreign machines.
-
I shouldn't have read this.
-
@bagfox idk why I used that tag... but I can't edit the post anymore... What do?
-
Funny how the "industry 4.0" buzzword has been rekt reallly fast by machine learning and A.I. buzz words.
-
3rd
-
@Bubbles i don't think you can put tags on comments. Though i find their jokes on matlab pretty funny. Sarcasm is my favourite humour.
-
@Root a bit less than MATLAB i hope
-
@shoop MATLAB surely has a built in function to cleanse you.
-
@c3r38r170 it is what you allow it to be. MATLAB can become everything you want it to become.
-
@endor you will find the light one day
-
@shoop not MATLAB's problem.
do not let mear monetary issues get in your way to greatness. -
no point in this remark i think.
It would be the same as saying:
There were no calculators before, people computed on paper and it took more time therfore they were better at computing.
Yes some people optimized and became better at doing calculations on paper because it took more time otherwise. This doesn't mean they were better at algebra, maybe faster than those who didn't optimize back then though. Certainly not faster than a time traveler with a calculator.
Just as someone, who learned to code without internet, spent time to optimize by remembering everything in order to avoid spending the time fetching and reading books.
Today, people optimze by increasing their ability to search and evaluate potential solutions through a jungle of shit solutions.
Anyway, the thing is:
the tools you have increase your productivity and therefore increase the expectations people have over your work output capacity. -
polymorphism is the act of casting a spell on someone and turning him into a sheep for 20 seconds if he is an NPC and 8 seconds if he is a player.
-
use "I" and "l" for more clarity
(capital i and lower case L)
it's even funnier when using "or" statements
if I || l:
print("much clear") -
The expression you want to "solve" is not an equation. I'd assume you mean:
(n/x)*(y/x) =0
I also assume you don't want the trivial answer:
y=0
======
Your problem seems a bit wierd. The second equation brings no usefull information as it can be reduced to:
x^2 = z.
and we already know x.
The first queation can be reduced to
n*y/x^2 = 0
since we know n and x, the only solution is y=0.
For this to be valid, x must not be equal to 0. -
check if your router over-heats. Happened to me. It was stacked over the modem which was generating a lot of heat. I just spaced them with a duct tape roll and voilà!
-
this is what happens when a bear expert teaches a bird how to fly.
-
more like
"don't re-invent the wheel when the deadline is in 2 days." -
The lack of punctuation in the bulleted list is dusturbing.
-
@metamourge yeah but for inexperienced people, arch is not a good option. It's like pushing someone who has never skied on an expert trail... not the best way to introduce you to the joy of skiing.
-
maybe the point of this is exactly to make you power your computer off.
peak energy efficiency. -
would be even funnier if it was your boss that posted it
-
check the pannel build type.
TN pannel = washed out shit colors
IPS pannel = better colors
(rule of thumb) -
Matlab
I SAID IT OK, I FUCKING SAID IT -
is it a graduate course or some of the last classes of your undergrade courses?
If so, get used to read the lines :
"exercie left to the reader"